Press Inquiries
Please contact us for any press inquiries
Contact Us
Shyam Valsan
By Shyam Valsan
August 6, 2018

We live increasingly online lives, and encryption is a crucial and necessary component of our digital existence. Encryption provides security for our data at all times, maintains data integrity, and protects user privacy.

When it comes to internet traffic and encryption, the two terms you'll hear thrown around most often are Secret Socket Layer (SSL) and Transport Layer Security (TLS), and it can get confusing if you aren't an expert. What's the difference between SSL and TLS? Are they the same thing? Which one is better? I’m glad you asked.

SSL and TLS are both cryptographic protocols that provide authentication and data encryption between servers, machines, and applications operating over a network. SSL was developed first, way back in 1995 by Netscape. TLS was designed to be a successor to SSL and replace it, and it made its debut in 1999 and was based on SSL 3.0. Over the years, new versions of the protocols have been released to address vulnerabilities and support stronger, more secure cipher suites and algorithms. SSL 2.0 and 3.0 have long been deprecated by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), and the internet deals almost exclusively with TLS today, with multiple versions having been released over the years.

It's been nearly a decade since TLS 1.2 was released, and it is the encryption protocol of choice for most internet traffic – more than 50% of the encrypted traffic on the internet runs on TLS 1.2. And now, after years of discussions and rework, the TLS 1.3 standard has been finalized as of March 21st, 2018. Last month, the IETF approved version 1.3 of the TLS specification to move to the standards track.


TLS 1.3 has several changes that improve performance and security, while also eliminating several complexities and simplifying the protocol stack. In short, it is a faster, simpler, and more secure alternative to existing TLS protocols. What's not to love?

Here's a quick look at some of the key updates in TLS 1.3 along with their implications:

Speed – 0-RTT

  • TLS 1.3 speeds up the time it takes to negotiate protocol versions, cipher suites, and authenticate the server.
  • This negotiation is done during the initial handshake between the client and server and is measured in round trip time (RTT) – the time it takes for a client to send a message to the server and for the server to respond back to the client.
  • With TLS 1.2, this would normally take 2-RTT or two round-trip times. TLS 1.3 cuts down the initial handshake to 1-RTT and in some cases 0-RTT by allowing session resumption.
  • A smaller RTT means faster connection times and web page load times, thus ensuring a more responsive browsing and internet experience.


  • Encrypted Handshakes
    • With TLS 1.3, all packets in the handshake after the initial client hello are encrypted. This includes the server certificates.
    • Network solutions that relied on understanding the information in the TLS handshake (e.g., validating the server certificate to identify anomalies) will no longer work.
  • Forward Secrecy
    • The use of static RSA and Diffie-Hellman key exchange has been replaced with ephemeral mode Diffie-Hellman, thereby providing forward secrecy.
    • Forward secrecy means that compromise of a private or long-term key in the future should not compromise the confidentiality of all past sessions.
    • Ephemeral mode Diffie-Hellman accomplishes this by coming up with a unique one-time key for each separate conversation between a client and server.
    • The implication of this change is that passive mode decryption using the RSA key exchange will no longer be possible.

Simplicity – Less is More

  • TLS 1.3 simplifies the TLS protocol and does some much needed clean up by removing support for older broken forms of cryptography and trimming the cipher suite.
  • This streamlining makes TLS 1.3 simpler to configure for server operators – and faster to use for the end users.
  • TLS 1.3 also allows a connection to down-negotiate to TLS 1.2 where either side does not support TLS 1.3, ensuring backward compatibility.

So how has the industry reception for TLS 1.3 been? Well, Sandvine took a detailed look at the data so far and two things are blindingly obvious:

  • Growth has NOT kicked off yet
    • Overall, adoption is still low and the growth curve has not taken off yet. Half a percent of all encrypted traffic is TLS 1.3, and that number hasn't increased drastically over the last quarter.
  • Facebook leads the way!
    • Facebook has decided to take the plunge and become THE high profile early adopter. They have adopted TLS 1.3 in some form across almost all of their services, including Facebook, WhatsApp, and Instagram.

The statistics also indicate that Google, Twitter, Microsoft, and others have started to experiment with TLS 1.3 as well, and we expect the numbers to rise and TLS 1.3 adoption to really pick up in 2019.


At Sandvine, we pride ourselves on classifying the internet and providing valuable insights to our customers, and TLS 1.3 is a change we welcome with open arms. TLS 1.3 holds no demons for us, as our traffic classification is not impacted by the improvements it brings – and in being faster, simpler, and more secure it benefits the users and the operators.

If you’d like to learn more about how Sandvine continues to thrive in a landscape with increasing encryption and what key use cases we can enable for you, then read our whitepaper “Shine a light on the darkening internet: How to thrive despite Encryption” or visit our website for more details.